According to economic cycles analyzed at the time by Keynes, Schumpeter subsequently, offer glimpses of the nature of the system consists of ups and downs of the different variables that describe it and turn it up. Several decades ago, in the early twentieth century, Lenin studied the anomalies of capitalism is that the natural state of this mode of production, in other words turning their origin [1] described as the consequence and conclusion back to the same state or natural origin, ie, the top marginal contradicted by the very contradiction.
Given the asymmetry of processes and institutions regimes of both state and market have established a single directive: capital accumulation, hence deriving the concepts of competitiveness, productivity, economies of scale, comparative advantages, income concentration and monopoly. When the story is close to the levels of accumulation of capital, two things happen: either increase the usefulness of the technology or increases farm surplus of being of Being, but never economic democracy.
Lenin (1920) predicts the clumping of rent when the market only a few countries and large companies in their economies, known as oligopolies. The free market does not allow the accelerated processes of capital accumulation, hence alienates the monopoly system and agencies such as the cartel or trust, however, is in a free market where they have thrived. The concentration of production, he regards the monopoly or say Kautsky, "the reactionary ideal" as part of the bourgeois logic, as a consequence, the export of capital and the increase in production to which they can compete on price and policy.
intermediaries to accelerate the cumulative processes, are the banks whose influence is monetary investments and changes in interest rates, these variables play the most important trigger for the same integration and economic doctrine positivism and pragmatism of the financial market or speculative imagination, which will give rise to a neglect of real market, or to use the real market as a means to detonate the money market.
In this instance, when the different actors in incidence are related to each other, man is replaced by "benefits" of competitiveness and market strategies and trade policy, as diversification of technologies, social communications and thoughts, will contribute to "the labor force is transmitted" (Lenin, 1987) at international levels. This brings the effect of extending of economic models and the contemplation of exogenous variables translated as if the development is a function, or as he calls neo-classical logic: the labor market, but the essence is the international transferability of goodwill and the alienation of labor in terms of persuasion of the system, it has been awarded part of the development.
Similarly, other factors of production such as technology glimpsed the acceleration of capital accumulation or control of production, which would cause economic and financial channels in the basic structure of capitalism, because the marginal returns economies of scale are becoming more dynamic and changes in financial markets are more volatile, not excluding the economic and foreign policies, or are the stars of the exclusion of developing countries, or are indentured to the marginalization of same countries that share the world as well as their cyclical associations, born "the struggle for economic territory "(Lenin, 1920).
Lenin refers to the new processes of financial capital, is the driving force accelerating mode of production, leading to end of the bottleneck, while its consistency persists, the levels of reconfiguration also expire in the very marginality of their own analysis. The grouping tendencies which share the power scheme breaks all classical economic theory, as a spokesperson for the perfect information and the invisible hand, that through the individualism and selfishness can achieve maximum benefit. Utilitarianism has increased economic cycles, making them ever smaller.
The current financial crisis brings to mind Lenin's imperialism as an eschatological element to the proximity of systemic elemental composition of capitalism, the chaos of this method of production mentioned Lenin, is only the beginning of the slow construct, a new paradigm close to the assertion of the significance of the human being developed and put together by their existence.
[1] The inflection is a historical-sociological term that explains the emergence of a structure according to the contradiction of the previous structures to the new structure. It is part of the argument of "contradiction" or the same Marxist dialectic
References
Lenin, VI (1987). Imperialism the Highest Stage of Capitalism. Mexico: Ediciones Quinto Sol
0 comments:
Post a Comment